Search:
Calendar:
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Subscribe:
Archives By Subject:
Adobe (33) [RSS]
AIR (7) [RSS]
Ajax (3) [RSS]
Buzzword (1) [RSS]
CFUG (42) [RSS]
ColdFusion (70) [RSS]
Flash (6) [RSS]
Flex (40) [RSS]
Frameworks (3) [RSS]
Free Software (2) [RSS]
FXUG (22) [RSS]
General (35) [RSS]
JpgMetadataReader (3) [RSS]
jQuery (1) [RSS]
Mac (2) [RSS]
Off Topic (13) [RSS]
OpenSource (14) [RSS]
PaperVision (10) [RSS]
Spry (2) [RSS]
Transfer (1) [RSS]
Tags:
Recent Entries:
Top Posts:
- [17962] Paper Vision 3D Sphere - Carousels on Steroids!
- [9921] Simple Dynamic Cursor Example in Flex2: With source code
- [9785] Simple PaperVision3D Blurring example
- [9626] PaperVision3D/Flex2 Carousel v0.2
- [9577] Simple PaperVision3D Blurring example : source code
- [9489] Saving images from Flex using ColdFusion: Simple Example with source code
- [9460] Carousel v0.2 - source code
- [9183] PaperVision Carousel0.3 - one step closer to the master plan!
- [7820] PaperVision3D is good for cubes! - a "geek" gift
- [6741] Simple Effects on a Form - Flex Example
Recent Comments:
- Getting Red from my color
David said: @Promethe: Thanks for the comment. Jason uses that way too in his example. working with number as n... [More] - Getting Red from my color
Promethe said: guys... seriously: var myColor : uint = 0xef556ef; var myRed : uint = (myColor >> 16) & ... [More] - Getting Red from my color
David said: @Jason: Thanks for the example! I never like working with numbers-to-strings-to-numbers. I'll pull y... [More] - Getting Red from my color
jason olmsted said: There is always more than one way to skin a cat. I threw together a quick class that offers easy to... [More] - Frameworks: Whats good about them, whats bad about them.
Arowolo said: I totally agree with you, and to add to your point, i think it also reduces ones understanding of th... [More]
Top Commenters:
- [8] Campbell
- [8] Ben Nadel
- [6] Steve Bryant
- [6] Mark Flewellen
- [4] barry.b
- [4] Raymond Camden
- [3] John Whish
- [3] Peter Bell
- [2] riabook
- [2] carlos
My Links:
Other Links
My Email:
djohnsmarie@gmail.com
RSS:
Answering "evaluate()"'s cry for help
Mark Ireland's blog post is-eval()-a-cry-for-help? caught my interest earlier today.
I don't normally do blog entries on other people blog entries, but this one got me thinking...
In his example he was asking if one code example was better or worse than another.
Times when I start convincing myself that I may need to use the "evaluate" function, I normally take a step back, look at the code and then work out a more elegant way to execute the code.
evaluate in it's self is not the end of the world, but the consistent use of it introduces overhead that can often be avoided. (a quick google search on "ColdFusion evaluate" shows multiple hits on how not to use it)
Peter Bell, an active and respected member of the CF community added this comment:
[quote]
You can *almost* always remove evaluate, but one case I keep running into is this.
I have a generic getter that calls a custom getter if it exists. If needs to call variables.get#PropertyName#().
I have to do:
because variables["get" & PropertyName]() isn't syntactically valid CF for some reason.
[/quote]
Here is one way to not use evaluate in that situation:
<cfset returnValue = fFunction()>
The ability in ColdFusion assign functions to values, then call that value is pretty cool. From my limited understanding, that is heading down the "Mixin" track.
You could declare a structure, and get functions from multiple CFCs and assign them to keys in that structure...
...when I start thinking about this, for some reason Frankenstein's CFC pops in to my head ...wonder why?
First off, many thanks for the suggestion - it works out perfectly! In my case this wasn't to implement mixins (although I use them elsewhere), but just to allow the calling of methods where the method name is determined dynamically.
Allows me to do stuff like
addMethod("GetAllUsers", "MethodType:getByFIlter|Filter:1=1|PropertyNameList:FirstName,LastName|Order:LastName, FirstName|");
then I can call("GetAllUsers") and I have me a method I don't actually need to code. useful for all of those little methods which really just parameterize more basic methods.
Thanks again for the solution to removing the evaluation!
Thanks for the more detailed explanation of what you are doing. I was a bit confused at first why you would call a dynamic "getProperty" function to call a static "getProperty" function, but now that makes sense! :-)
I have generic getter so you can Product.get("Title"), but what happens if you want the Title to be calculated? Well then you add a getTitle() method to property. But then you are not encapsulating changes as the calling templates wuld have to change from get("Title") to getTitle() - not good. So the genric getter says "if there is a custom getter, use it and return the value, else go get the data from inside the bean". In that way the interface is always get("Title") and that method is smart enough to look for and call getTitle() if it exists.
The other thing above is something else I use to remove a lot of my methods and replace them with metadata.
Thanks for posting on the above. There is precious little information about dynamic CFML so your post was appreciated.
I thought I would give your example a go.
For this example, assume a CFC called User is in scope. On the CFC is a method called getUserID. The User.cfc stores the UserID internally as variables.instance.userID.
Finally, the function 'getUserID' simply returns variables.instance.UserID. All Boilerplate bits so far.
When I use the technique you outlined above to call the method, it seems to decouple itself from the User component and lose all knowledge of whence it came, throwing this error:
'Element INSTANCE.USERID is undefined in VARIABLES.'
Which leaves me to believe that when calling an external CFC, the only two ways to leave the scope intact is cfinvoke or evaluate. Is there another technique I am missing?
Dan Wilson
I just did some quick testing and your conclusion seems correct.
From what I understand of Peter's examples they look like they are running inside a CFC, so even if you move the function in to a variable INSIDE a the CFC you will have no problems as it will have access to all the scopes/variables in that CFC.
Peter is doing lots of funky stuff in his method to make one call that then function (dynamically) calls other getters inside the CFC itself.
So, if a function does rely on state inside a CFC, from outside the CFC you can't assign it to a variable/structure and call it, as it won't have access to the "state" of the originating CFC.
However, if you move that function in to another CFC that has that state, it will work.
If you want to look at my testing code, it is here: http://www.harrisfamily.net.nz/devblog/enclosures/...
I haven't really used this in "real life" myself, but I would check out (Guru) Hal Helms if I started to.
See: http://www.halhelms.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=newsl...
HTH
Great post.. I thought it had solved my problem with having to use evaluate but unfortunately it hasn't due to the need to create a method in the CFC I am attempting to dynamically call a function from (to ensure state is maintained).
I can't do this as the CFC I am accessing is a singleton. To get this to work I would have to create a random function name each time right? That is possible but it seems a longwinded way to allow me to call a CFC method that isn't known at runtime.
I really would prefer not to use evaluate but can't see how I can avoid it in this instance.. :(
Thanks for the insight though.. I've learnt something from this - the ability to call functions by assigning them to a variable and then calling that as a function..neat.